Shopping Blog
Advertising
Archives
Classifieds
Giveaways
Homepage
RSS Feed
Search
Twitter
Web Feeds









Categories
Auctions
Auto
Baby
Books
Celebrity
Charity Products
Children's Products
Collectibles
Entertainment
Fashion
Fashion Accessories
Fragrances
Games
Gourmet
Green
Hair Care
Handbags
Health
Holiday Decorations
Holiday Gift Ideas
Holiday Shopping
Home
Jewelry
Makeup
Mother's Day
Movies
Music
Pampered Pets
Photography
Plastic Surgery
Real Estate
Services
Shoes
Shopping Advice
Shopping Tools
Sports and Fitness
Tech
Toys
Travel
Unusual Auctions
Virtual Worlds
Weddings
Weight Loss



Add to MyYahoo

Add to MyMSN

Add to Bloglines

Add to NewsGator



Posts with tag: british-expense-scandal | Return to ShoppingBlog.com Homepage

Taxpayers Footing the Bill for Congressional Personal Expenses

Here we go again. Not to be outdone by the British political expense scandal, American lawmakers are expensing items such as expensive cars, tvs and cameras at the American taxpayers' expense. Just like in the British scandal, the expenses uncovered -- so far -- are technically legal. But just as British taxpayers are outraged that they are paying for lawmakers' luxuries, American taxpayers are going to be less than thrilled when they find out what they've been footing the bill for. The Wall Street Journal reports:
Florida Rep. Alcee Hastings spent $24,730 in taxpayer money last year to lease a 2008 luxury Lexus hybrid sedan. Ohio Rep. Michael Turner expensed a $1,435 digital camera. Eni Faleomavaega, the House delegate from American Samoa, bought two 46-inch Sony TVs. The expenditures were legal, properly accounted for and drawn from allowances the U.S. government grants to lawmakers. Equipment purchased with office expense accounts must be returned to the House or the federal General Services Administration when a lawmaker leaves office. Journal Community

But as British politicians come under widening scorn for spending public money on everything from candy bars to moat-dredging, an examination of U.S. lawmakers' expense claims shows Washington's elected officials have also used public funds for eye-catching purchases. U.S. politicians, unlike their counterparts in Great Britain, can't bill taxpayers for personal living expenses. The U.S. Treasury gives them an allowance to cover "official and representational expenses," according to congressional rules, and the lawmakers enjoy a fair amount of discretion in how they use the funds.

The Senate and House release volumes of the reimbursement requests for these allowances, but do not make them available electronically. A Wall Street Journal review of thousands of pages of these records for 2008 expenses showed most lawmaker spending flowed to areas such as staff salaries, travel, office rent and supplies, and printing and mailing.

But it also turned up spending on an array of products, from the car leases and electronics to a high-end laptop computer and $22 cellphone holder. Rep. Howard Berman expensed $84,000 worth of personalized calendars, printed by the U.S. Capitol Historical Society, for his constituents. A spokeswoman for Mr. Berman, a California Democrat, didn't return requests for comment. The records show that some lawmakers spent heavily in the final months of the year to draw down allowances before the end of December -- a time when U.S. households were paring their budgets and lawmakers were criticizing Detroit auto executives for taking private aircraft to Washington to plead their case for taxpayer funding.

Rep. Hastings, a Democrat, and Rep. Turner, a Republican, made their purchases in the third quarter. Rep. Faleomavaega, a Democrat, bought the TVs for $1,473 apiece in mid-November. Spokespeople for the three didn't return requests for comment. House members get a government expense allowance of $1.3 million to $1.9 million a year. Senators get $2.9 million to $4.5 million. The disparity is based on several factors, with lawmakers whose home states are far from Washington, for example, typically receiving more to cover their higher travel expenses.
Not surprisingly, no one wanted to comment for this article. Steve Ellis, vice president of the nonpartisan Taxpayers for Common Sense says that the figures are misleading because the politicians do not have to provide individual receipts and instead lump expenses together. Furthermore, he says that the information is very difficult to find and is not available electronically.

Posted on May 31, 2009
Permalink | Subscribe | | | Comments (View)



Jon Stewart Explains the British Parliament Expense Scandal

The British press has non stop coverage of one of the biggest political scandals ever to rock the country. Apparently, the members of Parliament have been taking advantage of a law which allows them to charge private expenses to the government. According to The Telegraph, some of the expenses charged to taxpayers included $3,400 to have a moat drained and a piano tuned on a 13th-century country estate; $25,000 to pay a mortgage that doesn't exist; $590 for horse manure; $10 for pay-per-view pornography and $942 to install a chandelier. The speaker of the House of Commons has now been ousted. He is the first speaker to be forced out of office since 1695.

Jon Stewart and John Oliver discuss the scandal on The Daily Show. Oliver helps put the scandal in perspective for Americans who may not understand how crucial castle moat maintenance really is. Take a look:

The Daily Show With Jon StewartM - Th 11p / 10c
Scamalot
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Economic CrisisPolitical Humor


Douglas Hogg has denied that he submitted a reimbursement claim for the work on his moat and expenses for piano tuning and stable light repair, despite the fact that The Telegraph has a letter from Hogg in which he details his expenses. In the letter he requested an exemption from having to provide detailed expenses because his costs of running the estate are so high. He attached a list of typical expenses, which included moat upkeep. The government gave him a waiver and simply reimbursed a flat 1/12 of his annual maximum allowance. Now Hogg says he never meant for taxpayer money to go towards the moat upkeep. And no, the British public isn't buying his explanation.

Posted on May 21, 2009
Permalink | Subscribe | | | Comments (View)

The Writers Write Lifestyle Network
Bloggers Blog
Crafters Craft
Drivers Drive
Fantasy SF Blog
Gamers Game
Health News Blog
HowToWeb.com
The IWJ Blog
Lovers Love
Media Cynic
Petosphere
Pleasant Morning Buzz
Readers Read
Science News Blog
Shopping Blog
Singers Sing
Surfers Surf
Traders Trade
Video Nacho
Watchers Watch
Workers Work
The Write News
Writer's Blog

Sales & Coupons
ShoppersShop.com's Sales & Deals section includes coupons, sales and free shipping offers.


Search ShoppingBlog.com





Add to Google













www.shoppingblog.com

Copyright © 2002-2009 by Writers Write, Inc. All Rights Reserved.