|
ShoppersShop.com's Shopping Centers
|
|
Homepage | October, 2007 Archives
Men in Makeup: The Battle Continues
The "Mean Wearing Makeup" story just won't die. Salon examines
the trend of men wearing makeup. Multiple references are made to the global cosmetics' companies evil plans to trick men into wearing makeup by calling it something else, e.g., concealer becomes "manly enhancements" or something equally ridiculous. But men are resisting the siren call of guyliner, despite Pete Wentz's best efforts.
But the culture that gave birth to the rugged masculine ideal of the Marlboro Man may not be ready to reach for the blush brush just yet. A GQ survey in 2005 reported that "92 percent of men would not wear makeup even if it guaranteed them a more fulfilling sex life." U.S. sales figures seem to confirm the ongoing resistance to men's makeup. Tres Wilson, executive director of Clinique Global Treatment Marketing, said, "Clinique's Skin Supplies for Men M Cover [a concealer that debuted earlier this year] and Non-Streak Bronzer products sell very well in Europe, much more so than in the U.S."
Even in the metrosexual age, dabbing concealer on a blemish is seen as an emasculating activity. American ambivalence about men's makeup seems to run pretty deep, as GQ fashion editor Brian Coats can attest, "I just think it can be a scary thing for guys to wear makeup. I kind of understand that." Coats believes makeup on men is not a good idea for the general population. "A guy should look like a guy. I think in general, guys just look better natural."
*****
Many men prefer to keep their makeup desires on the down-low, and cosmetics companies are happy to oblige, employing discreet packaging and butch names. Take Jean Paul Gaultier's Brow and Lash Groomer: It is ingeniously designed to look like a pen. It's also mascara. 4VOO's impressive-sounding Confidence Corrector is a product better known as concealer.
Even the term "makeup" requires a makeover: The winning euphemism for men's makeup seems to be "enhancement." Jean Paul Gaultier refers to its line as "men's aesthetic enhancement." Sephora added a "complexion enhancers" category on its site a year ago, and Biotherm Homme's Power Bronze line of concealer and tinted gel is touted as "instant skin enhancement."
We have a weird feeling that after hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent in advertising to convince men that they need makeup -- and that gorgeous women actually prefer men in makeup -- eventually the men will give in to the siren call of marketing and slap on some concealer. But we really draw the line at male lip cosmetics. Other than SPF-laden lip balm. Hmmm...it really is a slippery slope, isn't it?
Posted on October 31, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
VegetableGate Intensifies as New Accusations Fly on Letterman
VegetableGate is really heating up. First, Dierdre Donahue of USA Today wrote an article
in which we find out that 15 of the recipes published in April, 2007 in The Sneaky Chef by Missy Chase Lapine the former publisher of Eating Well magazine, appeared word for word in Jessica Seinfeld's just published book, Deceptively Delicious: Simple Secrets to Get Your Kids Eating Good Food. Yet Jessica swears she never saw the other book. So far Missy Chase Lapine has been quite gracious about it, saying she wasn't going to directly accuse anyone of plagiarism. But then Jessica's husband Jerry Seinfeld got into the act. He went on the David Letterman show and did a whole monologue about how Ms.
Lapine is some kind of wacko and celebrity stalker. He even jokes that she's probably an assassin because she has three names.
It's pretty vicious, and ignores the fact that Ms. Lapine's book was not published "at the same time" as his wife's -- it was published six months earlier. And Ms. Lapine's full manuscript was submitted to HarperCollins (also Ms. Seinfeld's publisher) twice before, in February, 2006 and in April, 2006. They turned it down and Ms. Lapine signed with another publisher. There are 150,000 copies of her book in print.
"I'm surprised that on the Oprah show this was being touted as an entirely new technique pioneered by Ms. Seinfeld," Lapine said Saturday.
The idea of stealth nutrition is not new, Lapine says. "My grandmother used to do it," she says, but her book is the product of five years of research. "My book is not just a concept. My book is a how-to manual."
Moreover, she adds, "I'm concerned and troubled that Oprah credited and applauded someone else for a technique that was out there six months earlier."
Winfrey was not available for comment.
Lapine says she and her publicists pitched the Oprah show five times without success. She also points out she submitted her 139-page book proposal with 31 recipes and 11 purees twice to HarperCollins (Seinfeld's publisher), once in February 2006 without an agent and again with an agent in May 2006.
"The one big fact is that they had access to my manuscript early on," Lapine says. Seinfeld's book was signed up in June 2006.
"There are at least 15 of my recipes that ended up in her book," Lapine says. However, she says, recipes are hard to protect: "If you change one ingredient, you're safe." She says that after her publisher contacted HarperCollins, Deceptively's cover was modified from the one featured on a promotional brochure. The word "simple" was inserted in place of "sneaky."
"Seinfeld is a big name, and it garners more attention than someone who doesn't have a big name," Lapine says. She and her publisher have no comment on possible legal action.
We think Jerry may have crossed the line into slander with his little tirade against Ms. Lapine. After all, this is a woman who was a magazine editor. She's no celebrity stalker or "wacko." Her only weakness is that she doesn't have a billionaire husband to defend her on major talk shows. You can see the video here.
Posted on October 30, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Men Reaching for Pilates
Pilates and yoga aren't just for women anymore. Trainer Jay Blahnik explains
in the L.A. Times why men are turning to Pilates to get stronger abs, stronger backs and to stand taller.
Fitness experts estimate that less than 15% of Pilates students are men, but that number is growing rapidly as more men begin to see the benefits such training can provide. Many professional sports teams have added Pilates to their training regime -- as have well-known male athletes and celebrities (golfer Tiger Woods among them).
There are two basic types of Pilates workouts: mat workouts and equipment-based workouts. Mat workouts are often done in a class setting with little or no equipment and can be found at most gyms. These classes contain a variety of calisthenic-type movements with very specific instructions. Equipment-based workouts are usually conducted in private or in small group settings and use large machines that make the most of straps, springs and railings. Mat workouts are often included in gym memberships; equipment-based workouts usually cost extra.
Jay suggests that guys who are worried that Pilates is only for women should take a female friend with them to their first Pilates class. Joseph Pilates, the founder of the method, was a boxer. He never intended the workout to be for women only -- it's good for men and women alike.
Posted on October 29, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
What Your Choice of Halloween Candy Says About You
The Washington Post has examined the all-important issue of what kind of Halloween candy you give out to trick-or-treaters says about you. Steve Almond, the author of Candyfreak: A Journey Through the Chocolate Underbelly of America), provided the in-depth psychological personality type treat analysis, based on....well, we're not exactly sure what he based it on. But we totally agree with his statement in his book:
"There's something incredibly liberating about a holiday that encourages children to take candy from strangers," Almond writes of Halloween in his book. Indeed. For some reason, Almond asked that we make clear that he is a "professional candyfreak, not a therapist."
Read on to find out what message you're sending to your neighbors:
Three Musketeers: Does well in groups but is somewhat pompous. Prone to fancy costumes and arcane weapons. Wears hats in public that are ill-advised.
Almond Joy: I'm going to put aside my aversion to coconut in praising these folks as happy-go-lucky.
Bit-O-Honey: They have contradictory personalities, hoping to express generosity but also having the passive-aggressive desire to damage the fillings of trick-or-treaters.
Butterfinger: Evasive, slippery, not necessarily to be trusted.
Candy Corn: Purely deluded people. They don't get that candy shouldn't attempt to imitate other food groups, particularly corn.
Good & Plenty: Optimistic, perhaps overly so. A little bit of Weimar energy. Strong advocate of gay rights; acquainted with the bitterness at the center of most lives.
Reese's Peanut Butter Cups: Generous souls. Those who understand the salty in life, as well as the sweet.
Snickers: Just going with the crowd, the safe candy choice, guaranteed to please the masses. Not ambitious, but dependable.
You can see the full chart with more analysis of your inner psyche, completely horrifying calorie counts and then vote on your favorite treat to hand out here.
A word of advice, though: whatever you do, don't give out Twizzlers. They'll peg you as one of the "Sickos. Truly demented. Plastic people living plastic lives."
Posted on October 27, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Going Organic: One Food at a Time
The New York Times has a good article
about five easy ways to add organic foods to your life. What's most horrifying -- not Halloween horrifying, but "Oh, great, I'm full of chemicals, horrifying" -- is the statistics about how much pesticides remain in the potatoes and apples you buy even after you wash and peel them. The five foods they suggest buying organic are: milk, potatoes, peanut butter, ketchup and apples.
We've tried the Heinz organic ketchup from Whole Foods and it's good. It doesn't have high fructose corn syrup in it, which is a plus. We always drink organic milk, not wanting to ingest any more hormones or antibiotics than need be. The peanut butter thing is different story, though. The peanut butter we grew up on -- Peter Pan and Skippy -- is loaded with extra oil and sugar. But it's thick and tastes right. Our all-natural peanut butter sits there in its jar, the naturals oils separated from the peanut part in an unappetizing mess. So you stir it up, but when you spread it, it goes everywhere because it's so runny. It makes us sad just to behold it.
Organic apples and potatoes are fine, but they are quite a bit more expensive than the regular varieties. They don't look as pretty as the ones grown with pesticides, but we think they taste better.
Posted on October 26, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Hannah Montana and Master Chief Most Popular Costume Searches
We reported earlier about a study that found that the most popular costume choices this year include pirates, princesses and superheros. A study by Hitwise has found that the most searched for costume this year is a Hannah Montana Costume. Pictured on the right is the Hannah Montana costume from Shindigz. Master Chief, Wonder Woman and pirates are also topping web searches. Master Chief is the lead character in the popular Halo 3 video game. Here is a list of the most popular costume searches according to Hitwise.
- hannah montana costume
- master chief costume
- pirate costume
- wonder woman costume
- little red riding hood costume
- hannah montana halloween costume
- tinkerbell costume
- pippi longstocking costume
- flapper costume
- raggedy ann costume
It wans't a top search according to Hitwise but a post on Yahoo Buzz says that Transformer costumes are another theme for 2007. Pictured on the right is a Transformers mask available here on BuyCostumes.com. Hitwise also found that people are searching for ideas using the keyword "homemade." Yahoo Buzz has a list of more search phrases that fit the do-it-yourself costume theme. Hitwise says people are also looking for sexy and funny costumes.
The websites receiving the most traffic from the term "hannah montana costume" were Costumzee.com, PriceGrabber.com, Celebrate Express, Target.com and Shopzilla. Other popular costume searches included Halo 3's Master Chief, pirates, Wonder Woman, Little Red Riding Hood, and Tinkerbell. The top descriptive search terms used for Halloween costumes include perennial favorites such as sexy, funny, homemade and cool. Also among the popular descriptive searches were "cheap halloween costume ideas" which increased 305 percent and the term "adult halloween costume" which increased 336 percent versus last year.
Hitwise also reported which online Halloween retail outlets have been receiving the most traffic. BuyCostumes.com, Halloween Express and Spirt Halloween topped the list.
- BuyCostumes.com
- Halloween Express
- Spirit Halloween
- Costume Super Center
- AnniesCostumes.com
- Costume Hub
- Costume Craze
- Zoogster Costumes
- Halloweenmart.com
- anytimecostumes.com
You can more last-minute Halloween shopping resources here.
Posted on October 25, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Bai Ling Loves Yogurt

This is a photo of Bai Ling enjoying some Fage Total Greek Yogurt at the 2007 Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week at Smashbox Studios. We're not sure why the woman in the purple sweater looks so shocked. The pose is perfect, really -- she's really got the the "I just can't wait to taste this delicious spoonful of yogurt" pose down cold. But then again, we can't really see the rest of her outfit.
Generally speaking, we are unmoved by the food choice of Bai Ling, but it just so happens that we already are fans of the yogurt. Fage yogurt was the official gourmet food of Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week.
We are especially fond of the plain, nonfat version which makes a great base for our favorite Tzatziki dipping sauce. But it also works quite well as a low or nonfat base for other recipes. So, we now have something in common with Bai Ling. We sure didn't see that one coming.
Posted on October 25, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Jennifer vs. Angelina: W Magazine Style
How obnoxious is this? W Magazine has decided to do two covers for its November issue: one features Jennifer Aniston and one features Angelina Jolie.
The sly devils over at W magazine have put both Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie, bold and beautiful, on the cover of their November issue—the Art Issue, if you will.
We'll tell you what's artful: the subtle rematch at play. It's no secret magazines played a big role in the fall of the Pitt-Aniston dynasty and the rise of Brangelina.
First, Steven Klein's breathtaking photo series of Brad and Angelina as a perfect suburban couple ran in W, only months after Aniston and Pitt announced their split.
Then, Aniston's first solo project (literally), The Break-Up, came with a rigorous promotional tour, in which she graced virtually every magazine cover with some kind of survivalist message like "I'm Okay!" or "I Will Survive!"
And now the two beauties square off in a newsstand death match. Are you prepared to make a decision?
Clearly, the editors at W absolutely delight in tormenting Jennifer Aniston. That idyllic photo spread of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie as a happy family when Brad was still married to Jennifer was just beyond tacky. So, now they are going to pit the two women against each other in some kind of sales competition? That's not art, that's a new low in crass commercialism.
So, which issue will you be buying? According to Forbes magazine, most people will be buying the cover with Jennifer Aniston on it. In a study, Jen was found to be the most popular covergirl -- when her picture is on the cover of a magazine, people buy it. And believe us, the magazine industry tracks those numbers very carefully.
Posted on October 24, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Gortraits Liven Up Halloween Decor
One of the hottest Halloween decorations this year is the Goretrait. No, it's not a portrait of Nobel Prize winner Al Gore. A Gortrait is an ancestor portrait which turns into something horrific when you move the photo or look at it sideways. It's a hologram. So, that painting rebels a shocking side of of Great Uncle Cyrus: apparently he was a vampire. Or a werewolf. Or any number of odd things. Talk about your skeletons in the closet.
Pictured is the Admiral Howl Gortrait. While out on the high seas heading for Cape Horn, the Admiral made the acquaintance of a werewolf during a full moon. He made it back to port intact, but a bit hairier. You can find this Gortrait and many others at
Frightcollection.com.
Posted on October 22, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Jessica Seinfeld Accused of Plagiarism in VegetableGate Scandal
It's time for another plagiarism controversy! This time, Jessica Seinfeld (she of the 21 Oprah Shoe Salute, has been accused of
plagiarizing
her bestselling cookbook for picky child eaters, Deceptively Delicious from a prior cookbook called The Sneaky Chef: Simple Strategies for Hiding Healthy Foods in Kids Favorite Meals
by Missy Chase Lapine.
Jessica Seinfeld, the comedian Jerry Seinfeld's wife, has a hot best seller with Deceptively Delicious, a cookbook for parents of picky eaters. Ms. Seinfeld's celebrity and an appearance on The Oprah Winfrey Show have helped propel the book to the No. 1 spot on the hardcover Advice, How-To and Miscellaneous list in The New York Times, where it will make its debut a week from Sunday.
But a number of readers posting on Amazon.com and Oprah.com and other Web sites have pointed out some similarities between Ms. Seinfeld's book, which was published this month by Collins, an imprint of HarperCollins, and another cookbook published by Running Press, an imprint of the Perseus Books Group, in April.
That book, The Sneaky Chef by Missy Chase Lapine, who is not a celebrity, also suggests that parents puree healthy foods like spinach and sweet potatoes and hide them in childhood favorites like macaroni and cheese or brownies. A week from Sunday it will be No. 9 on the paperback Advice, How-To and Miscellaneous list.
It turns out that Ms. Lapine, a former publisher of Eating Well magazine, had submitted her 139-page proposal for The Sneaky Chef," complete with 42 recipes, to HarperCollins twice -- once in February 2006 without an agent and again in May last year, the second time represented by an agent. Both times she was rejected. She landed a deal with Running Press in June 2006, the same month that Collins won an auction to publish Ms. Seinfeld's book.
"Honestly I can't speculate, and I'm not going to accuse anyone of anything," Ms. Lapine said. "I suppose it's possible it's a coincidence."
In a telephone interview, Ms. Seinfeld said she had come up with the idea more than two years ago in her kitchen while pureeing butternut squash for her youngest son and cooking macaroni and cheese for her husband and two oldest children. "I've been obsessed with this for the past two years," said Ms. Seinfeld, who worked with a chef and a nutritionist on the book. "I don't need to copy someone's idea. I've got enough going on in my life."
Apparently, people who had read both books noticed that the recipes were the same -- spinach in macaroni and cheese (blech) -- and the like, which is suspicious because the food combinations are so odd. (Not to mention revolting, but that's another issue entirely.)
Jerry Seinfeld says he "doesn't think we have another Watergate here" and so far Missy Chase Lapine hasn't sued anyone. But VegetableGate may just be beginning to simmer, as the media picks up on the story.
Posted on October 19, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Sleep With a Ghost
A haunted house can be your Halloween travel destination. Staying at a haunted house is the theme of many a horror film but the hotels listed in Historic Hotels of America have people to take care of you and feed you. The photo above it the The Crescent Hotel & Spa in Eureka Springs, Arkansas. You can read about some of the supernatural activitiy that occurs in the Crescent here. One of that haunted areas in the hotel is Room 218.
The Victorian 1886 Crescent Hotel and Spa in Eureka Springs, Ark., hosts a wide variety of spirits. It is said that after the skeleton frame of hotel had been constructed in the 1880s that one of the Irish stone masons plunged to his death in what is now room 218. This room proves to be the most spiritually active room in the hotel and has attracted television film crews for decades because of the quantity and quality of the sightings reported. Throughout the history of the hotel, employees have referred to this entity at "Michael," a classified poltergeist due to the nature of the unexplained activity. Guests have witnessed hands coming out of the bathroom mirror, cries of a falling man in the ceiling, the door opening then slamming shut, unable to be opened again. The intrigue of this activity had drawn guests to specifically request room 218 for the chance of experiencing something.
You can read about other hauntings at historic hotels from the Historic Hotels of America here and here. For other directories of haunted hotels and towns try here, here, here, here and here.
Posted on October 18, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Most Popular Costumes: Princesses, Pirates, Witches and Superheroes
We already looked at the most popular costumes for our furry friends. Here are lists for the most popular costumes for children and adults according to a study from the National Retail Federation (NRF).
In adult costumes witches are the clear favorite. Witches are still the top choice in this year's list just like they were in last years. That's the Vampira costume from BuyCostumes.com in the picture on the right.
| Top Adult Costumes |
| # of Adults |
| 1. | Witch | 5,664,339 |
| 2. | Pirate | 1,267,363 |
| 3. | Vampire | 1,034,582 |
| 4. | Cat | 853,530 |
| 5. | Princess | 750,072 |
| 6. | Fairy | 646,614 |
| 7. | Wench/Tart | 646,614 |
| 8. | Clown | 543,156 |
| 9. | Angel | 491,427 |
| 10. | Nurse | 465,562 |
| 11. | Devil | 413,833 |
| 12. | Monster | 413,833 |
| 13. | Ghost | 387,968 |
| 14. | Star Wars Character | 387,968 |
| 15. | Zombie | 387,968 |
| 16. | Athlete (Baseball, Football, etc.) | 336,239 |
| 17. | Grim Reaper | 336,239 |
| 18. | Cop | 310,375 |
| 19. | Doctor | 310,375 |
| 20. | Dracula | 310,375 |
| 21. | French Maid | 310,375 |
The princess costume is still topping the costume charts for kids. It is pretty similar to last year's list except Spider-Man's ranked a little higher this year. Superman does not appear to be as popular this year probably because there was no motion picture. That's the Rose princess costumes pictured on the right from eToys.com.
| Top Kids Costumes |
| # of Kids |
| 1. | Princess | 4,168,472 |
| 2. | Spider-Man | 1,882,536 |
| 3. | Pirate | 1,848,919 |
| 4. | Witch | 1,647,219 |
| 5. | Fairy | 1,109,351 |
| 6. | Disney Princess | 806,801 |
| 7. | Star Wars Character | 806,801 |
| 8. | Pumpkin | 773,184 |
| 9. | Ghost | 705,951 |
| 10. | Power Ranger | 672,334 |
| 11. | Monster | 638,717 |
| 12. | Ninja | 638,717 |
| 13. | Vampire | 605,101 |
| 14. | Athlete (Baseball, Football, etc.) | 504,251 |
| 15. | Batman | 504,251 |
| 16. | Cheerleader | 470,634 |
| 17. | Cowboy/Cowgirl | 470,634 |
| 18. | Superman | 470,634 |
| 19. | Cat | 437,017 |
| 20. | Dora the Explorer | 437,017 |
| 21. | Dragon | 437,017 |
| 22. | Firefighter | 437,017 |
| 23. | Hannah Montana | 437,017 |
| 24. | Harry Potter | 437,017 |
| 25. | Tinkerbell | 437,017 |
| 26. | Winnie the Pooh Character | 437,017 |
You can find Halloween shopping resources here on ShoppersShop.com.
Posted on October 17, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Catherine Zeta-Jones is the New Face of Di Modolo
Catherine Zeta-Jones has been chosen as the new face of Milan luxury jeweler Di Modolo. The new campaign will feature the Oscar-winning actress in ads which will run in such publications as Town and Country, W and Vogue. The Italian firm is expanding its collections
to include the new Tempia Timepiece Collection, which ranges in price from $12,500 to $55,000, and the Di Modolo Haute Couture line, which focuses on diamonds. The firm feted Catherine with a reception at its flagship store in New York City.
"We are so happy to welcome Catherine as the face of Di Modolo," said Benny Shabtai, President & CEO of Di Modolo, "She embodies a natural radiance and international appeal that is an ideal match with our brand."
"I am delighted to be working with Di Modolo," Catherine said. "The collections strike a perfect balance between classic glamour and cutting edge beauty."
Catherine is the perfect spokesperson for the jewelry line. She always looks elegant and being gorgeous doesn't hurt either. You can see the collections at
DiModolo.com.
Posted on October 17, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Oprah Gets a 21 Shoe Salute
Now that's what we call a thank you present. Last week, Jessica Seinfeld (wife of Jerry Seinfeld) went on The Oprah Winfrey Show to promote her new cookbook called Deceptively Delicious. The cookbook has recipes for pureeing vegetables so you can hide them in your children's food: like spinach and carrots masquerading as a chocolate cupcake.
Anyway, the book became a bestseller immediately afterward, so Jessica sent Oprah 21 pairs of gorgeous shoes as a thank you gift because there "were no words." Many of the pairs were Christian Louboutin, so that makes this a very nice thank you gift -- in the $15,000 range.
You can see the video clip here.
Jessica's cookbook has child psychologists and nutritionists up in arms: some say that hiding vegetables in food does no good at all, that picky eaters eventually grow out of it and that you're lying to your kids. It also teaches them to eat lots of cupcakes instead of learning to like vegetables. Alternative suggestions were to just add some cheese to the vegetables or make carrot sticks and dip. Frustrated moms say if they don't get some vegetables or fruit into their kids, they're going to get scurvy or something.
This whole controversy reminds of Battle Eggplant on Iron Chef last night. Cat Cora pureed eggplant and put it in her famous chocolate brownies with a peanut butter and cream cheese frosting. Everyone thought they tasted great, but Cat Cora is an Iron Chef: she could make anything taste delicious. Certainly Andrew Firestone of The Bachelor seemed to enjoy them.
We can't really focus on the ethics of hiding vegetables in your child's macaroni and cheese right now, because we're still obsessing over Oprah's 21 Shoe Salute.
Posted on October 16, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
The Return of the Caftan
See, we told you so. The Telegraph has an investigative piece about the return of the caftan. Only they spell it with a "k" (either a "c" or a "k "is correct) and have broadened the definition of caftan to include shirts, beach cover-ups and dresses that have a caftan-feel about them.
Ten years ago, you wouldn't have wished a kaftan on your worst enemy, let alone yourself. We were living in the age of the sarong, and short, sexy, sequinned numbers covered every bikini and one-piece from Benidorm to St Barts.
The kaftan, with its roomy drapes of fabric, was the epitome of uncool. It was a Seventies throwback, a hoary relic of the Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young era. No one with a sense of style wanted anything so long and all-encompassing, so irredeemably polyester and oh so horribly reminiscent of Abigail's Party. It was so far off the fashion radar that it hardly even qualified as vintage.
But three decades later, on the 30th anniversary of Mike Leigh's middle-class satire, so memorably and unfashionably epitomised by Alison Steadman, the kaftan has come back to life.
Slowly, quietly, the floaty cover-up has staged an uprising: it has swamped the sarong and overpowered the pareo to become the mainstay of the holiday wardrobe. It is now a fashion classic.
This summer, designers such as Roberto Cavalli, Zandra Rhodes and Helen David of English Eccentrics are using the kaftan as a blank canvas for animal patterns, beaded silk florals and psychedelic screenprints.
On the high street, Principles and River Island have versions in tropical prints and sequin-trim chiffon, while the flame-haired British model Lily Cole wears a black and multicoloured floral one, to dramatic effect, in Monsoon's latest campaign.
Even Kate Moss has included a pale peach kaftan with multicoloured, Guatemalan-inspired embroidery in her first collection for Topshop.
Juliet Dunn, the British designer who is known in New Delhi as the "kaftan queen", is, more than any other, responsible for its remarkable recovery.
*****
It was not an easy comeback, however. "It was still seen as a bit of a Seventies leftover in England back then," Dunn says. It was only when chic shops in St Tropez began stocking the collection, in 2001, that the kaftan craze took off.
These days, Julia Roberts, Beyonce and Penelope Cruz are all fans, and there are now several dozen variations to choose from.
"I've varied the length and I've changed the shape," says Dunn. "They used to be much more billowy; now they're more slimmed-down, but they're still a very forgiving silhouette."
We usually think of caftans as something you wear over a swimsuit so you can go out to lunch or something you wear to a costume party when you're feeling the Moroccan vibe, but that apparently is changing. Does it mean a full return to the style (or lack thereof) of the 70s is imminent? Will we be forced to take up mind-altering drugs, wear heavy eyeliner and a turban? And -- most importantly -- does it mean we get to lounge around more than usual? Because, trust us, no one gets any work done while wearing a caftan, whether it's shirt-length, dress-length or all the way to the floor.
Source
Posted on October 15, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Chloë Sevigny For Chloé Eau De Perfume
Chloë Sevigny is the new face of Chloé Eau De Perfume, which will hit stores in Februay, 2008. Coty, Inc. hosted a party for 800 guests at the Hotel de la Monnaie, which was redecorated for the occasion in the style of the new fragrance.
The perfume was presented only to the women in a special room where they could have their photos taken in a setting that evoked the advertising campaign. Later, the guests were treated to a concert by
The Kills, who performed tracks from their new album. Guests included Lily Cole, Mary-Kate Olsen, Aure Atika, Ludivine Sagnier, Ellen von Umverth, Joey Starr, Julie Depardieu.
Pictured is Chloë posing with French actress Clemence Poesy and model Anja Rubik. Chloë has an umlaut over the e in her name, but the perfume has an accent over the e, which has the actress quite concerned.
"It's very flattering," said Sevigny on being picked to represent Chloé Eau de Parfum, before adding, with a laugh, "I'm concerned that the customers might be confused, though; I have the umlaut in my name while they have the accent. I'm Chloë, not Chloé."
And while Rubik stars in the current Chloé ad campaign, Poésy had an altogether uncanny connection to being a fragrance face as well. "I play a girl named Chloé in my film In Bruges," she laughed.
It's all very confusing. And speaking of confusing, caftans are back. Seriously back. And now that Chloë Sevigny has worn a see-through, modified caftan to a major soirée, well, you know what's coming next. It will be all caftans, all the time. You'll see.
Posted on October 13, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Dear Lipstick: You Know That You're Toxic
Today we can't get a song out of our heads: yes, it's "Toxic," one of our favorite Britney Spears songs:
With a taste of your lips
I'm on a ride
You're toxic
I'm slipping under
With a taste of
poison paradise
I'm addicted to you
Don't you know that
you're toxic
And why would we be singing that song today? Well, because random tests on 33 popular lipsticks showed that quite a few of them are full of lead. You remember lead from history class, right? Many aristocratic Romans suffered from lead poisoning because they used lead pipes in their famous baths. That caused a host of ailments, including infertility, gout, cancer, reduced IQ, kidney damage and neurological damage. Oh yes, and it causes major birth defects in fetuses and brain damage in children.
The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics randomly purchased more than 30 lipsticks in four cities and sent them to a lab for lead testing. More than half came back with levels of lead.
"It's unconscionable that women should have to worry about lead in lipstick," said Stacy Malkan of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics.
The coalition's report found that 20 of the 33 lipsticks it sent to be tested contained lead. Higher levels were found in products made by L'Oreal, Cover Girl and Christian Dior.
Because there is no federal standard for lead in cosmetics, the advocacy group used the Food and Drug Administration's limits for lead in candy as a yardstick.
"We want the companies to immediately reformulate their products to get the lead out and ... ultimately, really we need to change the laws and force these companies to be accountable to women's health," Malkan said.
But the trade group representing the cosmetics industry said the report is nothing new and, not surprisingly, the findings are not cause for worry.
"I think the levels are actually quite low - trace levels - really not something that would present a cause for concern," said John Bailey of the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association.
Experts say pregnant women should be extra aware when it comes to lead-tainted products. "Lead is a proven neurotoxin. It can cause learning disabilities. It's also linked to miscarriage and infertility," Malkan said.
Bailey advises that all pregnant women consult their physician before choosing their cosmetics.
L'Oreal told ABC News that all its products are in compliance with FDA regulations and that it upholds the highest standards of safety for its customers. Proctor and Gamble, maker of Cover Girl, said that it stands behind the safety of its products and that all its products go through rigorous testing procedures.
The FDA has no guidelines for the amount of lead that can be used in cosmetics. The researchers used as a guideline the allowable level of lead in candy in the U.S., which is as close to none as you can get. You can see a list of which lipsticks were tested here
in a .pdf file. Unfortunately, Dior Addict had a higher concentration of lead. LVMH (which owns Christian Dior and Louis Vuitton), said that it doesn't add lead to its lipstick (it's a poison, so that's good!) but it is a byproduct of certain pigments. There is no safe level of lead for humans and over years, a woman can ingest enough lead to cause problems, according to experts.
Because many lipsticks had almost no lead (such as MAC Matte Lipstick Viva Glam and Revlon Colorstay Lipcolor in Red Velvet, for example) it is possible to reformulate all lipsticks so that they don't contain lead yet still have a bright red color.
The cosmetics companies need to reformulate immediately. There is just no excuse for having any amount of lead in lipstick. Period.
You can read more about all the horrible things in your makeup at Safecosmetics.org.
Posted on October 12, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Anthony Bourdain Blasts Rachael Ray's Doughnut Deal
Anthony Bourdain, he of the brilliant cuisine and the caustic mouth has blasted Rachael Ray's new deal with Dunkin' Donuts.
RACHAEL Ray is getting a royal dunkin' from Anthony Bourdain for her big-bucks endorsement deal with Dunkin' Donuts. The prickly chef and "Kitchen Confidential" author says of the Food Network cutie in next month's Outside magazine: "She's got a magazine, a TV empire, all these best-selling books - I'm guessing she's not hurting for money. She's hugely influential, particularly with children. And she's endorsing Dunkin' Donuts. It's like endorsing crack for kids."
Bourdain adds: "I'm not a very ethical guy. I don't have a lot of principles. But somehow that seems to me over the line. Juvenile diabetes has exploded. Half of Americans don't have necks. And she's up there saying, 'Eat some [bleeping] Dunkin' Donuts. You look great in that swimsuit - eat another doughnut!' That's evil." Ray's rep shot back: "Anyone who knows Rachael [sic] and watches her on TV is aware she promotes balance and moderation, instead of living life in extremes. Her work addressing kids' and families' nutritional needs speaks for itself so we respectfully disagree with Anthony's opinion."
Oh, please. It's not like Rachel is doing an ad for crack or crystal meth. Or even for cigarettes. So Rachael gets some die-hard Krispy Kreme fans to switch to Dunkin' Donuts. So what? And if Bourdain really cared about people's health, he wouldn't have used the example of how someone looks in a bikini to bolster his argument. Remember, he didn't like it when overweight people dined in his restaurant and has compared vegans to Hezbollah. He's just shooting off his mouth, as usual. Or maybe he hasn't been offered any lucrative endorsement deals lately. He's always bagging on Rocco DiSpirito for his deals. But Rocco DiSpirito is a great chef -- and he's absolutely darling. Or maybe, as a former heroin and cocaine (and LSD and mushrooms and...you get the idea) addict he feels the need to reform everyone around him, whether they need reforming or not. A two pack a day smoker, Bourdain has some funny ideas about healthy habits.
And speaking of Anthony Bourdain, did you see the Top Chef reunion show last night with all the clips? One particularly hilarious clip showed Chef Tom Colicchio just beaming with joy when Howie sliced Bourdain into tiny verbal pieces by by quoting his own book at him to prove him wrong. It was priceless.
Posted on October 11, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Pink Ducks Designed by Celebrities Auctioned for Charity
Pink bath ducks from Munchkin, Inc. are being auctioned off on eBay to raise money for Susan G. Komen for the Cure. Each one of the ducks was designed by a celebrity. Plain pink bath ducks are also being sold to raise money for the Susan G. Komen charity. Plain ducks cost $2.99 and they can be found here on Munchkin, Inc. In 2006, Project Pink raised over $30,000 through the combination of the celebrity duck eBay auction and sale of more than 70,000 pink ducks to consumers nationwide.
The ducks designed by celebrities can be found here on eBay. The auction includes ducks designed by Marcia Cross, Jaime Pressly, Brooke Shields, Melissa Joan Hart, Barbara Bush, Jaclyn Smith, Lucy Liu, Matthew McConaughey, Katie Couric, Nancy O'Dell and several other stars. The auctions each last seven days and run in stages until November 6th.
It looks like Matthew McConaughey - described as a "soulful surfer dude" - spent the most time designing his duck. Matthew's duck includes a custom-made surfboard complete with a beach-themed holding case. Way to go surfer dude!
Posted on October 10, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Black Flats for Fall
We were looking for some cute black flats for fall when we found these darling new black suede ones from Juicy Couture. Appropriately named "Envy", the shoes are made of black suede with a leather lining and soles. The sole says "Smells Like Couture", so if you don't like people trying to read the bottom of your shoes, these might not be the shoes for you. But we love the large gold chain detailing, the low 1/2" heel and the elastic on the heel so they don't slip off during a wild dash for a cab.
They retail for $228.95 at
Zappos.com, and they also come in ruby and chocolate.
Posted on October 10, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Global Warming Affecting Fashion Industry
According to an interesting article
in Australia's The Age, global warming is wreaking havoc on the clothing industry. In many parts of the world, there just isn't as much difference between the seasons anymore and overall the trend is towards warmer weather. The clothing industry relies on delineated seasons to sell different types of apparel. But if you can wear flip flops all year long (and not just in Southern California), clothing sales will drop. Warmer weather also affects the type of fabrics designers use and the styling.
It is forcing fashion houses to ditch traditional seasonal collections for transeasonal garments that may lead to a drastic overhaul of fashion show schedules and retail delivery dates.
"The whole fashion system will have to change," Beppe Modenese, founder of Milan Fashion Week, told The New York Times last week.
"The fashion system must adapt to the reality that there is no strong difference between summer and winter any more... You can't have everyone showing four times a year to present the same thing. People are not prepared to invest in these clothes that, from one season to the other, use the same fabrics at the same weight."
Mr Modenese's comments came as New York fashion retailers blamed a prolonged "Indian summer" for poor autumn sales. Who needs a woollen pea coat when it is 30 degrees-plus?
So worried are some fashion houses about the impact climate change is having on the way we dress and shop, they are calling in the climate experts.
The Wall Street Journal reported last month that American retail giant Liz Claiborne Inc had enlisted a New York climatologist to speak to 30 of its executives on topics ranging from the types of fabrics they should be using to the timing of retail deliveries and seasonal markdowns.
Other US fashion retailer giants, including Target and Kohl's, have also started using climate experts to plan their collections and schedule end-of-season sales. And from January, Target will sell swimwear year-round.
Closer to home, fashion designers say they are increasingly designing transeasonal collections using lighter- weight fabrics for a more temperate climate and readjusting their in-store delivery dates in line with the unpredictable seasons.
"There's really no such thing as defined autumn/winter and spring/summer collections any more," says Margaret Porritt, of Melbourne fashion label Feathers.
"A lot of my garments are more transeasonal and rather than dropping them into store twice a year like I used to, I tend to move things in and out of store every couple of weeks, depending on the weather."
Things were different when she started the business 35 years ago.
"Back then winter went into store in mid-January and summer in mid-June and that was it. There was nothing in between. I also used a lot more heavier wools and made great big heavy coats. I can't do that anymore; it just doesn't get cold enough, even here in Melbourne. They just don't sell."
It's true that we don't buy as much heavy winter clothing as we used to, now that we think about it. And our boot purchases have also tapered off, which is a shame since we adore boots. But unlike Mary-Kate Olsen, we just can't wear sweaters, coats and boots on an 80 degree day.
We adore winter clothes: cashmere sweaters, fabulous boots, wonderful hats and a gorgeous coat all make an appearance after the first frost. The thought of living year round in shorts is appalling to us. We may have to consider moving north in the future.
Posted on October 9, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Add a Splash of Red to Your Wardrobe
We love the look of a splash of red to an otherwise somber-colored outfit for fall and this new red, patent leather bag from Kooba fills the bill nicely.
The Natasha Bag is big, with a shoulder strap, tab closure and side toggles in silver-toned hardware. It retails for $625 at Neiman Marcus.com. If the Natasha is too big for you, there is also a matching clutch (the Penelope) which is smaller, sleeker and retails for $295.00.
Posted on October 9, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Kate Moss Mascara Ads Banned in U.K.
The ads for Rimmel Magnif'eyes Mascara ads featuring Kate Moss have been banned in England for being misleading. The ads claim that Magnif'eyes mascara produced 70% more lift, with a "unique vertical life brush".
The Broadcast Advertising Clearance Center in Britain was not amused and said:
"Because we had not received documentary evidence that Kate Moss was not wearing false lashes in the ads we concluded that the images of the eye lashes in the press and TV ads may have exaggerated the benefits of the product, and were likely to mislead consumers.
We told Rimmel not to repeat the ad in its present form. We advised them to include a disclaimer in future ads where post production techniques had been used to increase the effects of a product, or where false lashes had been used."
It's clear from the ad that Kate is wearing false eyelashes -- as happens in every print and television ad for mascara that we've ever seen. Are women really fooled by these ads? Or are the exaggerated claims considered "mere puffery" under the law? If the claims are considered mere puffery (under U.S., not British law), it means that no person in her right mind would think that you could get eyelashes an inch long from mascara alone. We know what we're seeing when we look at mascara ads, but there certainly is an argument that younger consumers might be fooled into parting with their money because of a fraudulent mascara-lengthening claim.
Hey, in Rimmel's defense, at least they didn't find lead in the mascara or anything. This much analysis is making our head hurt: we're heading to Starbucks. With our non-digitally-enhanced eyelashes.
Posted on October 8, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Victoria Beckham on Ugly Betty
Victoria Beckham is a beautiful bridesmaid on an upcoming episode of Ugly Betty. Pictured is Vanessa Williams as uber-editor Wilhemina Slater of Mode magazine, checking the fit of Victoria's Vera Wang bridesmaid dress.
The Daily Mail
reports
that Victoria wanted was paid $150,000 for her work. And she was worth every penny, we just know it. In fact, we can't wait to see the episode. Ugly Betty has been absolutely hilarious so far this season: Vanessa Williams really deserves an Emmy. She's just fierce. And we're so glad that cute Henry is back! He needs to dump the lying, scheming red-haired girl and come back to Betty for good.
Posted on October 6, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
The Mommy Makeover
The latest trend for new moms is to immediately undergo a "Mommy Makeover" post-pregnancy. The Mommy Makeover involves a tummy tuck, a boob job, liposuction and whatever else is needed to erase the signs of giving birth. Plastic surgeons are packaging services together and marketing the packages to moms who are unhappy with their post-partum figures. Some women are fine with trend, because anything that raises self-esteem for women is good. Others, however, are furious that the post-pregnancy body is being held up as something to be ashamed of.
Dr. David A. Stoker, a plastic surgeon in Marina Del Rey, Calif., has a surgical cure for the ravages of motherhood. He, like many plastic surgeons nationwide, calls it a "mommy makeover."
Aimed at mothers, it usually involves a trifecta: a breast lift with or without breast implants, a tummy tuck and some liposuction. The procedures are intended to hoist slackened skin as well as reduce stretch marks and pregnancy fat.
"The severe physical trauma of pregnancy, childbirth and breast-feeding can have profound negative effects that cause women to lose their hourglass figures," he said. His practice, Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, maintains a Web site, amommymakeover.com, which describes the surgeries required to overhaul a postpregnancy body.
"Twenty years ago, a woman did not think she could do something about it and she covered up with discreet clothing," Dr. Stoker said. "But now women don't have to go on feeling self-conscious or resentful about their appearance."
In 1970, Our Bodies, Ourselves, the seminal guide to women's health, described the cosmetic changes that can happen during and after pregnancy simply as phenomena. But now narrowing beauty norms are recasting the transformations of motherhood as stigma.
These unforgiving standards are the offspring of pop culture and technology, a union that treats biological changes as if they were as optional as hair color. Gossip magazines excoriate celebrity moms who don't immediately lose their "baby weight." Even Cookie, a luxury parenting magazine, recently ran an article that described postpregnancy breasts as "the ultimate indignity" and promoted implant surgery; a photo of droopy water-filled balloons accompanied the article.
Many women struggle with the impact of aging and pregnancy on their bodies. But the marketing of the "mommy makeover" seeks to pathologize the postpartum body, characterizing pregnancy and childbirth as maladies with disfiguring aftereffects that can be repaired with the help of scalpels and cannulae.
"The message is that, after having children, women's bodies change for the worse," said Diana Zuckerman, the president of the National Research Center for Women and Families, a nonprofit group in Washington. If marketing could turn the postpregnancy body "into a socially unacceptable thing, think of how big your audience would be and how many surgeries you could sell them," she said.
This has gotten totally out of hand. Normal women now feel bad about themselves if they don't have a perfect body one month after pregnancy, like Sarah Jessica Parker. Think of how many commentators called Britney Spears fat after seeing her performance at the VMAs.
We think women should be able to have any elective surgery they want for their own reasons. But the wholesale marketing of the concept that you are unattractive if you have a post-pregnancy body infuriates us.
Posted on October 4, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Popular Pet Costumes in 2007
There will be lots of furry devils, witches and pumpkins in people's homes on October 31st. A National Retail Federation (NRF) study has found that 7.4 million households will be dressing up a pet for Halloween this year.
According to the National Retail Federation's 2007 Halloween Consumer Intentions and Actions Survey, conducted by BIGresearch, an estimated one in ten celebrants (11.0%), or 7.4 million households, plan on donning their beloved pet in some sort of costume this year.
Devils (12.0%) and pumpkins (9.2%) top the list of pet costumes, with witches (4.5%), princesses (3.8%) and angels (3.3%) rounding out the top five.
"Many consumers who own pets think of them as family members," said NRF President and CEO Tracy Mullin. "Pet owners will go all out to include dogs, cats and other critters in Halloween festivities, including trick-or-treating, handing out candy or even celebrating at a friend or family members' house."
Here is the list of the most popular pet costumes according to the study.
| Top Pets' Costumes |
| 1. | Devil | 12.00% |
| 2. | Pumpkin | 9.20% |
| 3. | Witch | 4.50% |
| 4. | Princess | 3.80% |
| 5. | Angel | 3.30% |
| 6. | Pirate | 2.80% |
| 7. | Hot Dog | 2.40% |
| 8. | Bat | 2.30% |
| 9. | Black Cat | 2.10% |
| 10. | Clown | 2.10% |
| 11. | Athlete | 1.70% |
| 12. | Bumble Bee | 1.70% |
| 13. | Ghost | 1.70% |
| 14. | Bowties/Fancy Collars/Bandanas | 1.40% |
| 15. | Superhero | 1.40% |
The "black cat" costume is interesting. Is that dogs dressing up as black cats or just black cats going as themselves? Pet costumes can be found at pet stores and many stores that sell people costumes are selling pet costumes at well. You can find a list of halloween shopping links here. The photo above is of a pirate dog costume found here on BuyCostumes.com.
Posted on October 3, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
In Search of the Amy Winehouse Beehive
Amy Winehouse has singlehandedly brought the beehive hairstyle back into the public consciousness. (It had been lying dormant our our subconscious since the B-52s burst on the scene.) In London, women are asking for backcombing in record numbers. So journalist Celia Walden trotted off to top London stylist Hari to try the beehive for herself. She only used her own hair in the process. To get a huge beehive like Amy Winehouse's, you'd have to use furballs like she does to give it more volume. Yes, furballs, that's what we said.
Here's the video of Celia's transformation:
Posted on October 3, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Has High School Musical Madness Gone Too Far?
Everyone is bonkers over High School Musical. But has the madness gone too far? While looking for some of our all-time favorite hand cream (Silicone Glove by Avon), we saw that Avon has created High School Musical Hand Cream. We actually did a double take at the search results. Each tube of cream features a happy dancing couple. The most popular so far has been the hand cream featuring Vanessa Hudgins and Zac Efron, happily leaping into the air. Alas, their hand cream is already sold out. Perhaps Avon will re-stock if enough fans with chapped hands write in.
The hand cream retails for only $1.49 and is available here.
Oh, and if you're looking for the amazing Silicone Glove -- we order it like ten tubes at a time -- is available here for $3.00 a tube. It's really thick, soaks right in and doesn't disappear after hand washing. Regular use softens as well as our favorite Bliss cream, for a lot less money. It's also great for feet.
Posted on October 2, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Study Indicates Halloween Spending Will Climb This Year
Retailers are excited because they expect you will be spending lots of money on Halloween costumes, cards, decorations and other goodies this year. The National Retail Federation (NRF) commissioned a study by BigResearch to see how much people would be spending and what they would be doing. They found that spending will rise with the average person planning to spend $64.82 on the holiday compared to $59.06 one year ago. Here is what BigResearch found people will be spending money on.
Halloween party-goers are bobbing for more than just apples. They'll also be on the lookout for candy, costumes and decorations. The average person will spend $23.33 on Halloween costumes (including children's and pet's costumes), though young adults will spend far more. In fact, according to the survey, 18-24 year-olds plan to be the most festive, spending $34.06 on costumes, nearly twice as much as they plan to spend on candy ($19.65). According to the survey, average spending will rise in all categories, including candy ($19.84, decorations ($17.73) and greeting cards ($3.92).
According to the study the most popular activity people have planned is handing out candy (72.9%) -- not really a surprise. Carving pumpkins (43.3%), decorating (47.8%) and attending parties (28.3%) were also popular with Halloween revelers.
The most popular activity on Halloween this year will be handing out candy, with nearly three-fourths (72.9%) of consumers planning to stay home to hand out treats. Other popular activities will include pumpkin carving (43.3%), decorating a home and/or yard (47.8%), and throwing or attending a Halloween party (28.3%).
Other Halloween activities listed in the study included take children trick-or-treating (33.1%), dress in costume (33.8%) and visit a haunted house (17.8%). You can find some resources for finding Halloween costumes and decorations here on ShoppersShop.com.
Posted on October 1, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Daniel Boulud Reveals the Secrets of Top Chef's Best Quickfire Challenge
We are absolutely obsessed with Top Chef around here. Our favorite episode by far this season was two weeks ago, when the contestants went to Le Cirque in New York and for the Quickfire challenge had to recreate the famous off-menu dish called Crisp Paupiettes of Sea Bass in Barolo Sauce. You may recall that Hung won that challenge by coming the closest the to taste of the original. Casey came in second. Some of the contestants were really puzzled as to how to recreate the dish they had just tasted and had a terrible time. Sarah's fish was undercooked, for example.
The finale of Top Chef airs this Wednesday night on Bravo live -- we can't wait! We're rooting for Casey, by the way. We like
Dale, too, but he's going to really have to bring it this week to pull off the win. Hung is technically proficient, but his flavor choices appall us at times. Cauliflower foam in a dessert? We think not.
Here is a video of Top Chef judge Gail Simmons of Food and Wine magazine helping Chef Daniel Boulud create the original version of Crisp Paupiettes of Sea Bass in Barolo Sauce:
Posted on October 1, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
|
|
The Writers Write Lifestyle Network
|
Sales & Deals
|
ShoppersShop.com's
Sales and Deals section includes links to coupons, discounts,
sales and free shipping offers at online stores.
| |
|